Example Project Documentation Demo
Frontmatter5 fields
Trust
UnverifiedDefault
Status
StableDefault
Sources 2
  1. Wikipedia Verifiability policywikipedia-verifiability
  2. Wikipedia Consensus policywikipedia-consensus
type
Architecture
title
Editorial workflow
description
How a claim and source move through the demo citation check and human review.
sources
  1. 1
    id
    wikipedia-verifiability
    title
    Wikipedia Verifiability policy
  2. 2
    id
    wikipedia-consensus
    title
    Wikipedia Consensus policy

Editorial workflow

The demo performs a small structural check before a person reviews a proposed Wikipedia edit. It does not decide whether a source is reliable.

flowchart LR
    A["Draft claim"] --> B["Add source URL"]
    B --> C["Run structural check"]
    C --> D["Review source support"]
    D --> E["Discuss and revise"]

Component boundary

src/citation-validator.mjs checks three facts:

  • The claim contains text.
  • The source value is a URL.
  • The source URL uses HTTPS.

The reviewer checks whether the source directly supports the claim. The reviewer also applies current Wikipedia policies and community consensus.

Change rule

Update this page when a code change moves responsibility between the validator, reviewer, or community process.

Related pages

Powered by OpenKnowledge.sh